This page provides AI-driven career astrology insights for Red Simpson's Kundali, analyzing professional strengths, ideal career paths, and growth opportunities through Vedic astrology.
After carefully analyzing the combinations of nine planets, twelve zodiac signs, and twenty-seven nakshatras, we have identified three areas of profession where one can potentially demonstrate exceptional proficiency and achieve the desired results. These three areas are -
Entertain/Music | 90.0% Politics | 82.0% Entertain/Business | 44.0%
With a deeper understanding of Vedic Astrology, we have classified one level deeper into subcategories. By identifying their areas of strength, we recommend paths that align with their skills to achieve success in recognition, fame, and wealth.
The bubble chart displays the most suitable profession based on your Kundali's planetary positions. The colour of the bubble indicates the category, while the bubble's size indicates the job's probability.
We have conducted an in-depth evaluation of your entrepreneurial potential, taking into consideration the strength of your personality, as well as your degree of freedom and independence in your profession.
Based on your Kundali Chart, you exhibit a moderate personality but possess a significant level of professional independence.
This combination is suitable for individuals involved in family businesses, middle management in companies, civil service, and similar fields.
You have high percentage of Floating nature 54.5%, while the percentage of fixed and conflicting are 22.0 % and 23.5 respectively.
Individuals with a high degree of floating percentage in their Kundali possess a unique set of skills and abilities that set them apart from others. They are highly adaptable and possess an open mind, which allows them to make quick decisions in their professions. Their job profile often requires frequent travel, and as such, they are constantly seeking name, fame and fortune. Although their ever-changing nature may sometimes lead to indecisiveness, a fickle mind, untrustworthiness, and an inability to persist with one thing, these individuals are happy travelers who rarely stay in one place. They typically fail to build fixed assets, but their skills make them ideal for professions such as salespersons, market advisors, sales managers and stock traders.
You have highest Earth element 41.5%, while the percentage of Fire, Air and Water are 13.5%, 22.0% and 23.0% respectively.
Earthy individuals possess traits such as stability, practicality, reliability, and grounded nature, which can have both positive and negative effects on their work. Positive effects include dependability, efficiency, stability, and attention to detail. Negative effects include resistance to change, rigidity, risk-aversion, and difficulty in delegating. Whether these traits are beneficial or challenging depends on the job role and work environment. To succeed, individuals with earthy traits can strike a balance between stability and flexibility by being open to change, delegating tasks effectively, and stepping out of their comfort zones occasionally.
You have highest Vaisya element 38.0%, while the percentage of Brahmin, Kshatriyas and Shudra are 25.0%, 14.0% and 23.0% respectively.
Individuals with high percentage of Vaishya Varna generally show inclined towards professions that involve business, finance, marketing, supply chain, logistics, real estate, and entrepreneurship. These professions involve managing money, investments, and commerce; promoting products or services; managing supply chains, transportation, and properties.
Our team has conducted an extensive analysis of your professional journey, spanning over 60 years from the age of 15 to 75. Our analysis is based on a comprehensive evaluation of various factors, including the strength of your house and planets, applicable Dashas, Transits, Shadbalas, Ashtakvarga, and more. Our findings are conclusive and will provide you with valuable insights into your professional life.
We have divided the entire 60 years timeframe into three smaller 20 years periods for better visualization and understanding. We have categorized the years into five categories, ranging from Extremely Good to Extremely Bad. You may navigate through each 20 year periods through different tabs.
The table below tells which year in the current 20-year tab will be extremely good, moderately good, neutral, moderately bad and extremely bad.
Extremely Good | 1956,1957,1961,1962,1963 |
---|---|
Moderately Good | 1958 |
Neutral | 1950,1955,1959,1964,1968,1969 |
Moderately Bad | 1951,1952,1953,1954,1960,1965,1966,1967 |
Extremely Bad | None |
An extremely good year is distinguished by notable achievements, significant progress, and substantial growth. It represents a transformative period that can positively impact an individual's professional trajectory. It involves noteworthy promotions, elevated job roles, or transitions to higher leadership positions within the organization, such as becoming a manager, director, or taking on C-suite roles, which signify a considerable leap in responsibility and impact. Professionals may receive prestigious awards, industry recognition, or accolades for their contributions. A standout year is characterized by exceptional performance evaluations and consistent positive feedback from superiors, peers, or clients. The year could involve substantial financial gains such as significant salary increases, bonuses, profit-sharing, or successful investments. It could also encompass securing major deals, projects, or contracts that significantly impact the organization's revenue.
A moderately good year is characterized by steady progress, personal growth, and notable achievements, with less emphasis on major breakthroughs or significant milestones. Instead of a major promotion, it may involve smaller advancements such as a salary raise, an expanded job role, or taking on additional responsibilities within the current position. A moderately successful year appreciates the efforts put into maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Professionals may have succeeded in managing their workload efficiently, allowing time for personal interests and family commitments. Receiving constructive feedback for improvement and being considered for growth opportunities within the organization are signs of a moderately successful year. Coping with challenges and displaying resilience in the face of adversity is a hallmark of a moderately successful year. Overcoming obstacles and adapting to changes without major setbacks demonstrates strength and adaptability.
A neutral year in terms of a career is a period of stability where professionals may experience a plateau in their professional journey without any noticeable setbacks or significant changes. During this period, individuals can meet job expectations and perform their duties adequately. However, it may lack remarkable achievements that distinguish exceptional years. It involves maintaining the current job role or position without substantial changes in responsibilities, titles, or advancements. Financially, it is characterized by a stable income without significant raises, bonuses, or substantial increases in earnings. It may not involve significant financial gains or losses compared to previous years. This period may not have a significant focus on personal development or skill enhancement, and professionals may continue their routine tasks without engaging in significant training, courses, or certifications to acquire new skills.
A moderately bad year is a phase where professionals may encounter certain challenges or setbacks that impede their usual progress. This period is marked by difficulties or obstacles that, while not catastrophic, can create a less than ideal professional environment. It may involve a phase where individuals struggle to meet expectations or fall short in delivering results up to their usual standards, which may result in receiving negative feedback or constructive criticism from supervisors or peers. This may also involve financial challenges such as minimal or no salary raises, reduced bonuses, or financial constraints that impact overall income. This could be due to economic conditions or organizational changes that affect compensation. In addition, there may be increased stress, conflicts, or a decline in workplace morale, which can lead to a less favorable work environment and impact productivity and overall job satisfaction. Individuals may also feel uncertain about their career path or lack a clear vision for their professional future, resulting in feelings of disengagement or dissatisfaction with their current role or industry.
An extremely bad year in terms of a career represents a period of severe challenges, setbacks. It can involve facing a variety of daunting circumstances that can have a lasting impact on both their professional trajectory and overall well-being. This may include sudden unemployment due to company restructuring, downsizing, or economic downturns, which can result in financial instability and uncertainty. Additionally, facing severe financial difficulties such as bankruptcy, heavy debts, or the inability to meet financial obligations due to job loss or unexpected expenses can significantly impact career stability and personal life. Moreover, legal challenges, allegations of professional misconduct, or reputational damage due to work-related incidents can have profound negative implications for career prospects. Personal crises, such as family emergencies, loss of a loved one, or significant life events, can affect focus, productivity, and engagement in the workplace. It's important to note that feeling isolated or unsupported by colleagues, supervisors, or the organization during times of crisis can exacerbate the challenges faced in an extremely difficult year.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each year on a scale of -100 to 100. A value more than zero means favourable for your career, while less than zero means not favourable. The chart includes the analysis from the Rashi and Moon charts. The Rashi chart is more important, while the Moon chart is used for confirmation. The horizontal bands indicate five categories of years.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1950 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1951 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1952 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1953 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1954 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1955 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1956 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1957 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1958 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1959 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1960 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1961 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1962 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1963 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1964 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1965 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1966 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1967 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1968 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1969 is classified as Neutral.
The table below tells which year in the current 20-year tab will be extremely good, moderately good, neutral, moderately bad and extremely bad.
Extremely Good | 1985,1986,1987 |
---|---|
Moderately Good | 1970,1971,1978 |
Neutral | 1973,1974,1977,1979,1980,1983 |
Moderately Bad | 1972,1975,1976,1981,1982,1984,1988,1989 |
Extremely Bad | None |
An extremely good year is distinguished by notable achievements, significant progress, and substantial growth. It represents a transformative period that can positively impact an individual's professional trajectory. It involves noteworthy promotions, elevated job roles, or transitions to higher leadership positions within the organization, such as becoming a manager, director, or taking on C-suite roles, which signify a considerable leap in responsibility and impact. Professionals may receive prestigious awards, industry recognition, or accolades for their contributions. A standout year is characterized by exceptional performance evaluations and consistent positive feedback from superiors, peers, or clients. The year could involve substantial financial gains such as significant salary increases, bonuses, profit-sharing, or successful investments. It could also encompass securing major deals, projects, or contracts that significantly impact the organization's revenue.
A moderately good year is characterized by steady progress, personal growth, and notable achievements, with less emphasis on major breakthroughs or significant milestones. Instead of a major promotion, it may involve smaller advancements such as a salary raise, an expanded job role, or taking on additional responsibilities within the current position. A moderately successful year appreciates the efforts put into maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Professionals may have succeeded in managing their workload efficiently, allowing time for personal interests and family commitments. Receiving constructive feedback for improvement and being considered for growth opportunities within the organization are signs of a moderately successful year. Coping with challenges and displaying resilience in the face of adversity is a hallmark of a moderately successful year. Overcoming obstacles and adapting to changes without major setbacks demonstrates strength and adaptability.
A neutral year in terms of a career is a period of stability where professionals may experience a plateau in their professional journey without any noticeable setbacks or significant changes. During this period, individuals can meet job expectations and perform their duties adequately. However, it may lack remarkable achievements that distinguish exceptional years. It involves maintaining the current job role or position without substantial changes in responsibilities, titles, or advancements. Financially, it is characterized by a stable income without significant raises, bonuses, or substantial increases in earnings. It may not involve significant financial gains or losses compared to previous years. This period may not have a significant focus on personal development or skill enhancement, and professionals may continue their routine tasks without engaging in significant training, courses, or certifications to acquire new skills.
A moderately bad year is a phase where professionals may encounter certain challenges or setbacks that impede their usual progress. This period is marked by difficulties or obstacles that, while not catastrophic, can create a less than ideal professional environment. It may involve a phase where individuals struggle to meet expectations or fall short in delivering results up to their usual standards, which may result in receiving negative feedback or constructive criticism from supervisors or peers. This may also involve financial challenges such as minimal or no salary raises, reduced bonuses, or financial constraints that impact overall income. This could be due to economic conditions or organizational changes that affect compensation. In addition, there may be increased stress, conflicts, or a decline in workplace morale, which can lead to a less favorable work environment and impact productivity and overall job satisfaction. Individuals may also feel uncertain about their career path or lack a clear vision for their professional future, resulting in feelings of disengagement or dissatisfaction with their current role or industry.
An extremely bad year in terms of a career represents a period of severe challenges, setbacks. It can involve facing a variety of daunting circumstances that can have a lasting impact on both their professional trajectory and overall well-being. This may include sudden unemployment due to company restructuring, downsizing, or economic downturns, which can result in financial instability and uncertainty. Additionally, facing severe financial difficulties such as bankruptcy, heavy debts, or the inability to meet financial obligations due to job loss or unexpected expenses can significantly impact career stability and personal life. Moreover, legal challenges, allegations of professional misconduct, or reputational damage due to work-related incidents can have profound negative implications for career prospects. Personal crises, such as family emergencies, loss of a loved one, or significant life events, can affect focus, productivity, and engagement in the workplace. It's important to note that feeling isolated or unsupported by colleagues, supervisors, or the organization during times of crisis can exacerbate the challenges faced in an extremely difficult year.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each year on a scale of -100 to 100. A value more than zero means favourable for your career, while less than zero means not favourable. The chart includes the analysis from the Rashi and Moon charts. The Rashi chart is more important, while the Moon chart is used for confirmation. The horizontal bands indicate five categories of years.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1970 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1971 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1972 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1973 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1974 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1975 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1976 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1977 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1978 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1979 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1980 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1981 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1982 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1983 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1984 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1985 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1986 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1987 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1988 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1989 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The table below tells which year in the current 20-year tab will be extremely good, moderately good, neutral, moderately bad and extremely bad.
Extremely Good | 1991,1992 |
---|---|
Moderately Good | 1999,2008,2009 |
Neutral | 1990,1993,1995,1997,1998,2000,2003,2004,2007 |
Moderately Bad | 1994,1996,2001,2002,2005,2006 |
Extremely Bad | None |
An extremely good year is distinguished by notable achievements, significant progress, and substantial growth. It represents a transformative period that can positively impact an individual's professional trajectory. It involves noteworthy promotions, elevated job roles, or transitions to higher leadership positions within the organization, such as becoming a manager, director, or taking on C-suite roles, which signify a considerable leap in responsibility and impact. Professionals may receive prestigious awards, industry recognition, or accolades for their contributions. A standout year is characterized by exceptional performance evaluations and consistent positive feedback from superiors, peers, or clients. The year could involve substantial financial gains such as significant salary increases, bonuses, profit-sharing, or successful investments. It could also encompass securing major deals, projects, or contracts that significantly impact the organization's revenue.
A moderately good year is characterized by steady progress, personal growth, and notable achievements, with less emphasis on major breakthroughs or significant milestones. Instead of a major promotion, it may involve smaller advancements such as a salary raise, an expanded job role, or taking on additional responsibilities within the current position. A moderately successful year appreciates the efforts put into maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Professionals may have succeeded in managing their workload efficiently, allowing time for personal interests and family commitments. Receiving constructive feedback for improvement and being considered for growth opportunities within the organization are signs of a moderately successful year. Coping with challenges and displaying resilience in the face of adversity is a hallmark of a moderately successful year. Overcoming obstacles and adapting to changes without major setbacks demonstrates strength and adaptability.
A neutral year in terms of a career is a period of stability where professionals may experience a plateau in their professional journey without any noticeable setbacks or significant changes. During this period, individuals can meet job expectations and perform their duties adequately. However, it may lack remarkable achievements that distinguish exceptional years. It involves maintaining the current job role or position without substantial changes in responsibilities, titles, or advancements. Financially, it is characterized by a stable income without significant raises, bonuses, or substantial increases in earnings. It may not involve significant financial gains or losses compared to previous years. This period may not have a significant focus on personal development or skill enhancement, and professionals may continue their routine tasks without engaging in significant training, courses, or certifications to acquire new skills.
A moderately bad year is a phase where professionals may encounter certain challenges or setbacks that impede their usual progress. This period is marked by difficulties or obstacles that, while not catastrophic, can create a less than ideal professional environment. It may involve a phase where individuals struggle to meet expectations or fall short in delivering results up to their usual standards, which may result in receiving negative feedback or constructive criticism from supervisors or peers. This may also involve financial challenges such as minimal or no salary raises, reduced bonuses, or financial constraints that impact overall income. This could be due to economic conditions or organizational changes that affect compensation. In addition, there may be increased stress, conflicts, or a decline in workplace morale, which can lead to a less favorable work environment and impact productivity and overall job satisfaction. Individuals may also feel uncertain about their career path or lack a clear vision for their professional future, resulting in feelings of disengagement or dissatisfaction with their current role or industry.
An extremely bad year in terms of a career represents a period of severe challenges, setbacks. It can involve facing a variety of daunting circumstances that can have a lasting impact on both their professional trajectory and overall well-being. This may include sudden unemployment due to company restructuring, downsizing, or economic downturns, which can result in financial instability and uncertainty. Additionally, facing severe financial difficulties such as bankruptcy, heavy debts, or the inability to meet financial obligations due to job loss or unexpected expenses can significantly impact career stability and personal life. Moreover, legal challenges, allegations of professional misconduct, or reputational damage due to work-related incidents can have profound negative implications for career prospects. Personal crises, such as family emergencies, loss of a loved one, or significant life events, can affect focus, productivity, and engagement in the workplace. It's important to note that feeling isolated or unsupported by colleagues, supervisors, or the organization during times of crisis can exacerbate the challenges faced in an extremely difficult year.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each year on a scale of -100 to 100. A value more than zero means favourable for your career, while less than zero means not favourable. The chart includes the analysis from the Rashi and Moon charts. The Rashi chart is more important, while the Moon chart is used for confirmation. The horizontal bands indicate five categories of years.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1990 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1991 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1992 is classified as Extremely Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1993 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1994 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1995 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1996 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1997 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1998 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 1999 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2000 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2001 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2002 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2003 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2004 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2005 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2006 is classified as Moderately Bad.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2007 is classified as Neutral.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2008 is classified as Moderately Good.
The chart explains the strengths & weaknesses of each month for the selected year on a scale of -100 to 100. The chart helps understand whether the month is favourable or not favoruable from a career growth perspective.
The year 2009 is classified as Moderately Good.